Five principles for constructive design-integrity discussions
A practical guide to evidence, fairness and responsible dialogue.
Original work deserves recognition. A constructive discussion about design integrity also needs care, evidence and a fair process. EDIC’s existing principles offer a useful starting point.
1. Start with evidence
Record what prompted the concern and distinguish observations from assumptions. Development history, function and chronology can help provide context. Similarity alone does not establish copying.
2. Give each party an opportunity to respond
A concern remains an allegation until a fair review is complete. Ask questions, allow time for a response and consider evidence from both sides before drawing conclusions.
3. Declare conflicts of interest
Be clear about commercial relationships or other interests that could influence a discussion. Anyone with a conflict should step away from an assessment or decision.
4. Respect lawful competition
Encourage innovation and genuine choice. A shared commitment to originality should not be used to restrict lawful market entry or disadvantage organisations outside the council.
5. Recognise the limits of an industry discussion
EDIC’s purpose is education, design integrity and responsible dialogue. It does not determine legal IP ownership or replace courts and legal advice.
Explore the Design Integrity Charter →
This guide summarises EDIC’s published principles. Formal concern submissions are not yet open; review procedures will be published when available.